Comparing Liszt piano works to Chopin piano works Research Paper

Comparing Liszt piano works to Chopin piano works - Research Paper Example Franz Liszt came to the limelight in the 19th century courtesy of his extraordinary skill as a pianist. His age mates regarded him the most skilled and advanced pianist and by 1840s he was regarded the best pianist of all time. Liszt was referred a romantic creator who is respected today in the entire globe. He caused a ripple to run through the European music landscape for two major reasons. First, he was one of the few composers of his level who also was a virtuosic artist, and secondly was because his works were unplayable, prominently said to require four hands to play his basic pieces. Liszt was a composer, a teacher of piano and instructor. He was the most famous representative of new German school while serving as a composer. He left a legacy to his name that shall remain in the annals of history as far as music is concerned. Particularly, he invented symphonic poem and advanced the idea of thematic changes. He also did a fundamental role in popularizing a large variety of music through transcribing it for piano.

A Claim for Religious Discrimination against Coach Al West Assignment - 2

A Claim for Religious Discrimination against Coach Al West - Assignment Example Title 11 of the Civil Rights Act recognizes sports arena, stadium, and other public places of exhibition or entertainment as public accommodation places (Loevy, 1997). For that reason, Ahman could bring a claim for religious discrimination against the NWSU coach under the Title 11 of the Civil Rights Acts. Â  Question 2 Answer: Mohammed Ahman could also bring a religious discrimination claim against NWSU coach under the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause. The First Amendment Free Exercise Clause recognizes the individual right to practice his/her religion, without any form of interference from the government or from anybody else (First Amendment: Chapter 9, n.d). Although by discriminating Ahman on religious grounds NWSU coach did not directly deny Ahman his right to practice his religion, the discrimination, however, indirectly interfered with Ahman’s right to religious freedom recognized by the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause. By asking the football team to recite the Lord’s player after each practice, the NWSU coach failed to recognize the Ahman’s religious freedom to exercise his religion of choice; this action, therefore, amounts to interference with Ahman’s right to freely exercise his religion. Secondly, the NWSU coach’s constant inquir y from Ahman on the relationship between Al-Qaeda and Islam shows that the NWSU coach had a negative attitude towards Islam as a religion. The negative attitude towards Islam could make Ahman uncomfortable in practicing his religion; this again amounts to interference with Ahman’s right to freely exercise his religion.